This is such a lovely piece of history! This is a late Victorian marked Sterling paste filigree bar brooch. The stones have brilliant fire and are clear and brilliant.

It is marked "STERLING" in the middle of the brooch on the backside and has beautiful filigree. It does have a old C clasp. No chips, nicks, flea bites out of the sterling or the paste stones. Overall a very lovely and beautiful piece of history!  $129.00

History About Paste Stones:

Paste, according to Antique Paste Jewellery by Malcolm David Samuel Lewis, is "glass which has been cut into gem-like forms". Pastes were used extensively from the 1700s to the early 1900s and were a desired material in themselves, not a replacement for diamonds and gem stones.

Invented by Georges Frederic Strass (1701-1773) in 1730, they could be set in silver, sterling or gold and could have been foiled or unfoiled (although 18th century paste was always foiled). Foiled pastes were usually seen in closed-backed settings where the foil provided added reflection and brilliance.

Pastes could be much more readily cut and shaped than diamonds, making a close-fitting pave look achievable, and a variety of shaped and sized stones makes a paste piece more desirable. Perfectly round stones will not be found in the early and best paste jewelry, nor will claw settings and knife-edge work. Cut down settings gave way to the coronet setting only in the 19th century. Paste could be fashioned in different colors, including an opaline cabochon similar to opals. Most paste came from France, England, Spain or Portugal. Some later pieces were hallmarked.

The introduction of paste in 1730 made the term "Age of Paste" applicable to the 18th century and their shimmer is as appealing today as it was when they were made. According to Antique Paste Jewellery, paste was only made from circa 1700-1865 but the term has been more generalized to include pieces up to the 1930-40s, and for some it is used to describe jewelry even later than that.


Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Leave a Reply